0xRAM LabsAutomated Security Assessment

OpenAgents

https://github.com/ClankerNation/OpenAgents
May 26, 2026 at 12:00 AMa18266bb-6cd
0/ 100
LOW RISK

Your protocol has 2 security issues — 1 High, 1 Low severity.

Security Overview //

Security Overview

🟢

Access Control

Secure

🟢

Reentrancy Protection

Secure

🟢

Oracle Security

Secure

🟢

Upgrade Safety

Secure

🟢

Input Validation

Secure

🟢

Event Logging

Secure

Severity Breakdown

Critical
0
High
1
Medium
0
Low
1
Info
0
134Lines of Code
1Contracts Analyzed
20Detectors Run
41msScan Duration

Vulnerability Breakdown

Below is a comprehensive breakdown of the vulnerabilities discovered in your smart contracts. As part of our marketing outreach, we expose the highest-severity vulnerability for free.

Free Security InsightHigh

Denial of Service (DoS) via unbounded array loop

BridgeValidator.sol:109

Impact

If the array size is influenced by users (e.g. dynamic list of depositors, addresses, tokens), an attacker or heavy usage can make the array grow, locking the protocol's key functions permanently.

Description

Line 109 contains a `for` loop that appears to iterate over the length of a dynamic array. If the array grows too large, the gas cost to execute the loop will exceed the block gas limit, causing the function to become permanently unusable.

Vulnerable Code

107 106 | /// @return True if the combined weight meets or exceeds the threshold.
108 107 | function hasConsensus(address[] calldata signers) external view returns (bool) {
109 108 | uint256 weightSum = 0;
110 >>> 109 | for (uint256 i = 0; i < signers.length; i++) {
111 110 | if (validators[signers[i]].isActive) {
112 111 | weightSum += validators[signers[i]].weight;
113 112 | }

Recommendation

Avoid iterating over unbounded dynamic arrays. Instead, use a pull-payment pattern or implement pagination so the loop can be processed in smaller, bounded chunks.

1 More Issue Detected

The following findings require expert review for full remediation guidance.

Low

Floating pragma: `pragma solidity ^0.8.20`

The Solidity version pragma `^0.8.20` is not locked to a specific compiler version. Different compiler versions may introduce different behavior, optimizations, or bugs.

1 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT >>> 2 | pragma solidity ^0.8.20; 3 | 4 | /// @title BridgeValidator

Lock the pragma to a specific version, e.g., `pragma solidity 0.8.20;`. Use the latest stable version for new contracts.

Full details available in comprehensive audit

Our automated scan found 2 issues. Our expert auditors go deeper — covering logic bugs, economic attack vectors, and cross-contract interactions that automated tools miss.

Initiate Secure Audit Request

Or email us at audit@0xram.com (Contact form is preferred for priority review)

Secure Your Protocol
Before Launch

This automated scan is just the surface. Our team of expert auditors conducts line-by-line manual reviews, formal verification, and economic simulations to ensure your protocol is battle-tested.

Initiate Priority Audit Intake

Or email us at audit@0xram.com (Contact form preferred for priority queueing)

145+
Protocols
$4.82B+
TVL Secured
0
Post-Audit Exploits

© 2026 0xRAM Labs. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: This report was dynamically generated by our automated static analyzer. It does not replace a comprehensive, line-by-line manual code audit by senior cryptographers.